Best AI humanizer: 12 tools, one published method
Walter Writes AI has the lowest list price per 10,000 words of the word-metered entry plans ranked here: $2.67, from Starter at $8 a month billed yearly for 30,000 words, checked on 8 November 2026. Humanize AI Pro follows at $4.99, Undetectable AI at $5.00 and StealthGPT at $6.00. That one fact decides nothing about output quality, which is why this page gives every tool the same fields and ranks them under one published method. Rank order below follows the list price per 10,000 words on each vendor's entry plan, lowest first, with yearly billing where the vendor shows it; plans metered in requests, prompts or unlimited words follow with their unit stated, and the one tool with no paid plan closes the list. Scores from the published method attach to each tool when a run completes, and every raw file from that run is downloadable from this site.
Updated
Short answer
Walter Writes AI has the lowest list price per 10,000 words of the word-metered entry plans ranked here, $2.67 on Starter ($8 a month billed yearly for 30,000 words, checked on 8 November 2026), ahead of Humanize AI Pro at $4.99, Undetectable AI at $5.00 and StealthGPT at $6.00. Request-metered, prompt-metered and unlimited plans follow with their own units stated, and Clever AI Humanizer, free with no paid plan, closes the list. Every tool carries the same fields: best for, main limitation, free tier, cheapest plan and per-request limit. The site scores each tool under one published method with 24 AI inputs, 6 human controls and five named detectors, weighting meaning kept above detector readings.
- Sample 01: Walter Writes AI
- Sample 02: Humanize AI Pro
- Sample 03: Undetectable AI
- Sample 04: StealthGPT
- Sample 05: TwainGPT (now Verva)
- Sample 06: HIX Bypass
- Sample 07: WriteHuman
- Sample 08: Phrasly
- Sample 09: Grammarly AI Humanizer
- Sample 10: QuillBot AI Humanizer
- Sample 11: BypassGPT
- Sample 12: Clever AI Humanizer
Best AI humanizer decision table: 12 tools on the same fields
Every figure in the table comes from the vendor's own pricing or product page, read on 8 November 2026. Where a page did not show a figure, the cell says so rather than guessing. BypassGPT's paid prices loaded only through a client-side sale banner and are left out until a browser check confirms them.
| Sample | Tool | List price per 10,000 words (entry plan, checked 8 November 2026) | Best for | Main limitation | Free tier | Cheapest plan (checked on 8 November 2026) | Per-request limit | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Walter Writes AI | $2.67 (Starter, $8 a month billed yearly, 30,000 words) | Monthly volume on a low entry price with three modes | Starter caps a request at 750 words | 300-word trial, no card | Starter, 30,000 words a month, $8 a month billed $96 yearly | 750 words (Starter) | Review of Walter Writes AI |
| 02 | Humanize AI Pro | $4.99 (Lite, $4.99 a month billed annually, 10,000 words) | Trying a rewrite with no account, then a cheap yearly plan | Every price is a yearly charge shown as a monthly rate, and Lite omits re-humanize and selective rephrase | Free, no account, no stated per-run cap (checked on 9 November 2026) | Lite, $4.99 a month billed annually, 10,000 humanizer words a month, checked on 9 November 2026 | No cap per process on Standard and Unlimited; not stated on Lite or the free tool | Review of Humanize AI Pro |
| 03 | Undetectable AI | $5.00 ($5.00 a month billed yearly, 10,000 words) | Short texts on a 10,000-word monthly plan | Trial is 250 words in total, and the request cap is not stated | 250-word trial | 10,000 words a month, $5.00 a month billed $60.00 yearly | Not stated | Review of Undetectable AI |
| 04 | StealthGPT | $6.00 (Pro, $29.99 monthly, 50,000 words) | High monthly volume split into short requests | 1,000-word request cap and a $29.99 monthly entry price, the highest listed here | None; $1 three-day trial | Pro, 50,000 words a month, $29.99 monthly | 1,000 words | Review of StealthGPT |
| 05 | TwainGPT (now Verva) | $10.00 (Basic, $8 a month billed yearly, 8,000 words) | Light monthly use under a new brand name | 8,000 humanizer words a month on Basic; free tier and request cap not stated | Not stated | Basic, 8,000 humanizer words a month, $8 a month billed annually | Not stated | Review of TwainGPT |
| 06 | HIX Bypass | $19.98 (Standard, $9.99 a month billed yearly, 5,000 words) | Long single requests on a small monthly budget of words | 5,000 words a month on Standard, the smallest paid allowance listed here | Not stated | Standard, 5,000 words a month, $14.99 monthly or $9.99 a month yearly | 3,000 words | Review of HIX Bypass |
| 07 | WriteHuman | Request-metered: $2.50 at the ceiling of 80 requests of 600 words ($12 a month billed yearly) | Occasional short requests on a request-count plan | Quota counts requests, not words: 80 requests of 600 words on Basic | 3 requests a month, 250 words each | Basic, 80 requests a month, $12 a month billed yearly ($20 monthly) | 600 words (Basic) | Review of WriteHuman AI |
| 08 | Phrasly | Not computable: Unlimited plan, $10.99 a month billed yearly | Very long inputs on one paid plan | One free rewrite a day, then three days of access for $2 | One free humanization a day, up to 500 words, no sign-up (read 9 November 2026); $2 three-day access | Unlimited, $10.99 a month billed annually | 800 words trial, 5,000 words paid | Review of Phrasly |
| 09 | Grammarly AI Humanizer | Not computable: Pro is priced in AI prompts, not words | Grammarly users who want humanizing inside the editor | Allowance is counted in AI prompts, not words | Free plan, basic humanization | Pro, $12 shown on the plans card | Not stated | Review of Grammarly AI Humanizer |
| 10 | QuillBot AI Humanizer | Not computable: Premium removes the word limit, no word pool stated | People already paying for QuillBot Premium | Free tier stops at 125 words per input and Basic mode | 125 words per input, Basic mode | Premium, $8.33 a month billed annually | 125 words free, no stated limit paid | Review of QuillBot AI Humanizer |
| 11 | BypassGPT | Not shown: paid prices did not render | Testing three modes on very short text | 80 words per free input and 150 free words a month | 150 words a month, 80 words per input | Paid tiers did not render on the pricing page | 80 words (free) | Review of BypassGPT |
| 12 | Clever AI Humanizer | No paid plan: free, 3,000 words a request | Long free requests with no account | No paid tier or published monthly ceiling to fall back on | Free, no stated monthly cap, no sign-up | None (free only) | 3,000 words | Review of Clever AI Humanizer |
Which humanizer should you choose?
One line per job. Each name links to its full review.
- Choose Walter Writes AI if you need around 30,000 words a month, can live with a 750-word request cap, and want Simple, Standard and Enhanced modes on the entry plan.
- Choose Humanize AI Pro if you want to try a rewrite with no account first and can pay a year up front for 10,000 words a month at $4.99.
- Choose Undetectable AI if your texts are short and 10,000 words a month covers you, and you are willing to pay a year up front for the $5.00 monthly rate.
- Choose WriteHuman if you send a few dozen short pieces a month and prefer a request count to a word count.
- Choose QuillBot AI Humanizer if you already pay for QuillBot Premium, since the humanizer's Advanced mode is included.
- Choose Grammarly AI Humanizer if you write inside Grammarly already and want humanizing as one more prompt in the editor.
- Choose Phrasly if your inputs run past 3,000 words; one free 500-word humanization a day shows the style, then $2 buys three days.
- Choose HIX Bypass if you send a few long requests a month and 5,000 words is enough.
- Choose StealthGPT if monthly volume matters more than request length and the $29.99 price is acceptable.
- Choose BypassGPT only for 80-word snippets until its paid prices are confirmed.
- Choose TwainGPT, now Verva, if 8,000 words a month covers you and you want the lowest-volume paid plan in the list.
- Choose Clever AI Humanizer if you want to humanize a 3,000-word text today without creating an account or paying anything.
How does the ranking work?
- Inputs
- 24 texts24 AI-written inputs across six genres plus 6 human-written controls, the same set for every tool.
- Detectors
- 5 namedGPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Pangram and ZeroGPT.
- Weights
- Meaning kept35
- Errors introduced20
- Detector pass rate30
- Limits and access15
- Run date
The 12 tools, same fields for each
Every tool gets the same fields, in rank order. The disc is the sample number it was poured under.
Sample 01: Walter Writes AI
Walter Writes AI offers a 300-word trial with no card, and its Starter plan gives 30,000 words a month for $8 a month billed $96 yearly, with a 750-word cap per request, checked on 8 November 2026 on the vendor's homepage pricing block. It names three modes: Simple, Standard and Enhanced.
Full review: Walter Writes AI review. Vendor site: Walter Writes AI. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- monthly volume on a low entry price with a choice of three modes.
- Main limitation
- Starter caps a request at 750 words, so a standard essay takes three passes and three joins.
- Free tier
- 300-word trial, no card required.
- Cheapest plan
- Starter, 30,000 words a month, $8 a month billed $96 yearly, checked on 8 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- 750 words on Starter.
Sample 02: Humanize AI Pro
Humanize AI Pro, the tool at humanizeai.pro, runs without an account behind a captcha and sells three yearly-billed plans: Lite at $4.99 a month for 10,000 humanizer words, Standard at $9.99 for 25,000 words with no cap per process, and Unlimited at $29.99, all read on the Humanize AI Pro pricing page on 9 November 2026. The pricing page lists "all modes and settings" on every paid plan without naming the modes, and the Lite plan omits the re-humanize and selective rephrase controls that Standard includes.
Full review: Humanize AI Pro review. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- trying a rewrite with no account, then a cheap yearly plan for light monthly use.
- Main limitation
- every price is a yearly charge shown as a monthly rate, with no month-to-month option in the page as served, and Lite lacks the two controls that make the tool useful.
- Free tier
- no account, described as unlimited on the home page, no per-run word cap stated.
- Cheapest plan
- Lite, $4.99 a month billed annually, 10,000 humanizer words and 5,000 paraphraser words a month, checked on 9 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- no cap per process on Standard and Unlimited; not stated on Lite or the free tool.
Sample 03: Undetectable AI
Undetectable AI's free trial is limited to 250 words in total, and its entry plan is 10,000 words a month at $5.00 a month, charged $60.00 annually, read on the Undetectable AI pricing page on 9 November 2026. The monthly toggle on the same page shows $9.99. The page names no modes and states no per-request cap.
Full review: Undetectable AI review. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- short texts on a 10,000-word monthly plan.
- Main limitation
- the trial is 250 words in total, the shown price needs a year paid up front, and the request cap is not published.
- Free tier
- 250-word trial.
- Cheapest plan
- 10,000 words a month, $5.00 a month billed $60.00 yearly ($9.99 monthly), checked on 9 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- not stated.
Sample 04: StealthGPT
StealthGPT has no free tier, sells a three-day trial for $1, and prices Pro at 50,000 words a month for $29.99 monthly with a 1,000-word cap per request, checked on 8 November 2026 on the vendor's pricing page. An API starts at $19 a month on the same page.
Full review: StealthGPT review. Vendor site: StealthGPT pricing. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- high monthly volume split into requests under 1,000 words.
- Main limitation
- the 1,000-word request cap and a $29.99 monthly entry price, the highest of the paid plans listed here.
- Free tier
- none; $1 three-day trial.
- Cheapest plan
- Pro, 50,000 words a month, $29.99 monthly, checked on 8 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- 1,000 words.
Sample 05: TwainGPT (now Verva)
TwainGPT now operates as Verva, and twaingpt.com redirects to verva.com; its Basic plan gives 8,000 humanizer words a month for $8 a month billed annually, checked on 8 November 2026 on the Verva pricing page. The page states no free tier, no request cap and no mode names.
Full review: TwainGPT review. Vendor site: Verva pricing. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- light monthly use on the smallest word-based paid plan here apart from HIX Bypass.
- Main limitation
- 8,000 humanizer words a month on Basic, with free tier, request cap and modes all unstated.
- Free tier
- not stated.
- Cheapest plan
- Basic, 8,000 humanizer words a month, $8 a month billed annually, checked on 8 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- not stated.
Sample 06: HIX Bypass
HIX Bypass, formerly at bypass.hix.ai and now at hixbypass.com, prices Standard at 5,000 words a month for $14.99 monthly or $9.99 a month billed yearly, with 3,000 words per input, checked on 8 November 2026 on the vendor's pricing page. Modes are Fast, Aggressive and Latest.
Full review: HIX Bypass review. Vendor site: HIX Bypass pricing. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- a few long single requests a month on a small monthly allowance.
- Main limitation
- 5,000 words a month on Standard is the smallest paid allowance in this list, so two long requests can use most of a month.
- Free tier
- not stated on the pricing page.
- Cheapest plan
- Standard, 5,000 words a month, $14.99 monthly or $9.99 a month yearly, checked on 8 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- 3,000 words.
Sample 07: WriteHuman
WriteHuman's Free plan allows 3 humanizer requests a month at 250 words each, and Basic allows 80 requests a month at up to 600 words each for $12 a month billed $144 yearly or $20 monthly, read on the WriteHuman pricing page on 9 November 2026. Two quality levels are named: Basic and Enhanced.
Full review: WriteHuman AI review. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- occasional short requests on a request-count plan.
- Main limitation
- the quota counts requests, not words, so 80 requests of 600 words is the Basic ceiling whether or not each request is full.
- Free tier
- 3 requests a month, 250 words per request.
- Cheapest plan
- Basic, 80 requests a month, $12 a month billed yearly or $20 monthly, checked on 9 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- 600 words on Basic.
Sample 08: Phrasly
Phrasly sells three days of access for $2 and an Unlimited plan at $10.99 a month billed annually, with an 800-word input on the trial and 5,000 words on the paid plan, checked on 8 November 2026 on the vendor's pricing page. Modes are Balanced, Strong and Max, and an API is offered.
Full review: Phrasly review. Vendor site: Phrasly pricing. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- very long inputs on one paid plan.
- Main limitation
- no free tier; the trial costs $2, and the Unlimited price assumes annual billing.
- Free tier
- none; $2 three-day access.
- Cheapest plan
- Unlimited, $10.99 a month billed annually, checked on 8 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- 800 words on the trial, 5,000 words paid.
Sample 09: Grammarly AI Humanizer
Grammarly's AI Humanizer is part of a free Grammarly account, and the plans page prices Pro at $12 with allowances counted in AI prompts per month rather than humanizer words, read on the Grammarly AI Humanizer page and Grammarly plans page on 8 and 9 November 2026. Four preset voices are offered; the page does not name them.
Full review: Grammarly AI Humanizer review. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- Grammarly users who want humanizing inside the editor they already use.
- Main limitation
- the allowance is counted in AI prompts, not words, so there is no published figure for how much text you can humanize.
- Free tier
- free plan with basic humanization; a Grammarly account is required.
- Cheapest plan
- Pro, $12 shown on the plans card, billing period not stated on the card, checked on 8 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- not stated.
Sample 10: QuillBot AI Humanizer
QuillBot's AI Humanizer is free in Basic mode with a 125-word limit per input, and Premium removes the word limit and adds Advanced mode, read on the QuillBot AI Humanizer page on 9 November 2026. Premium was $8.33 a month billed annually on 8 November 2026, with a $5.00 promotional rate shown.
Full review: QuillBot AI Humanizer review. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- people already paying for QuillBot Premium.
- Main limitation
- the free tier stops at 125 words per input and Basic mode only; Advanced mode needs Premium.
- Free tier
- 125 words per input, Basic mode, with three uses of Advanced mode stated on 8 November 2026.
- Cheapest plan
- Premium, $8.33 a month billed annually, checked on 8 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- 125 words free; no limit stated on Premium.
Sample 11: BypassGPT
BypassGPT's free tier is 150 words a month at 80 words per input, with Fast, Creative and Enhanced modes, read on the BypassGPT pricing page on 9 November 2026. The paid tiers on that page load through a client-side sale banner and did not render on either check, so no paid price appears here.
Full review: BypassGPT review. Scoring rules: method.
- Best for
- testing three modes on very short text.
- Main limitation
- 80 words per free input and 150 free words a month, with paid prices not confirmed.
- Free tier
- 150 words a month, 80 words per input.
- Cheapest plan
- not shown on the pricing page as rendered on 8 and 9 November 2026.
- Per-request limit
- 80 words on the free tier.
Sample 12: Clever AI Humanizer
Clever AI Humanizer is the only tool in this list with no paid plan: it is free, accepts 3,000 words per request and asks for no sign-up, checked on 8 November 2026 on the vendor's homepage. It names two modes, Normal and Clear & Structured, and offers an API.
Full review: Clever AI Humanizer review. The scoring rules are on the method page.
- Best for
- long free requests with no account.
- Main limitation
- nothing beyond the free tier. There is no plan to buy if the free limit or the service changes, and no published monthly ceiling.
- Free tier
- free, no stated monthly cap, no sign-up.
- Cheapest plan
- none; free only.
- Per-request limit
- 3,000 words.
Why do humanizer rankings disagree?
Three reasons, and none of them is that one site is lying.
First, detectors disagree with each other. GPTZero describes a sentence-by-sentence deep learning classifier with three labels, human, AI and mixed, and states a false positive rate of no more than 1 percent (GPTZero, technology page, read 9 November 2026). Copyleaks states a false positive rate of 0.03 percent and a minimum of 255 characters per scan on its web platform (Copyleaks, AI Detector page, read 9 November 2026). Two detectors built on different training sets will read the same paragraph differently, so a ranking built on one detector moves when you swap the detector.
Second, paraphrasing changes detector readings, and most rankings only measure that. Weber-Wulff and colleagues tested 14 detection tools and found all of them below 80 percent accuracy, with accuracy falling further on paraphrased and machine-translated text (Weber-Wulff et al. 2023, International Journal for Educational Integrity). A ranking that scores detector readings alone rewards the tool that rewrites hardest, whatever that does to the argument.
Third, detectors misread some human writing. Liang and colleagues found that detectors flagged 61 percent of TOEFL essays by non-native English writers as AI-generated (Liang et al. 2023, Patterns). That is why this site runs 6 human-written controls through every detector on every run: a reader can see what a human text scores on that detector before judging a humanized one.
| Detector | What it reads, per its own documentation | Published statement used here |
|---|---|---|
| GPTZero | Sentence-by-sentence deep learning classifier; labels human, AI or mixed | False positive rate no more than 1 percent (technology page, read 9 November 2026) |
| Originality.ai | A language model trained on known AI, mixed and human records | Current models 5.0 and 5.0 Max, launched October 2026 (accuracy page, read 9 November 2026) |
| Copyleaks | Linguistic modelling and deep learning trained on human-written text | False positive rate 0.03 percent; 255-character minimum on the web platform (read 9 November 2026) |
| Pangram | Transformer classifier trained with hard negative mining and synthetic mirrors | Technical report, arXiv 2402.14873, July 2024 version |
| ZeroGPT | Multi-stage analysis from document level to sentence level | 98.4 percent accuracy and under 1 percent false positives, as the vendor's own metrics (DeepAnalyse page, read 9 November 2026) |
This site weights meaning kept at 35 of 100 points and detector pass rate at 30, so a tool that lowers a detector score by dropping a claim or inventing a fact loses more than it gains. Other sites weight differently, or do not publish weights at all. When this ranking and another disagree, check which detectors each used, how many inputs, and whether anyone read the output for meaning.
No detector score should be the only evidence in a misconduct case.
For academic readers: check your institution's AI policy before using any writing tool. A humanizer does not make undisclosed AI use acceptable. The academic writing ranking covers disclosure first and tools second, and the free humanizer ranking lists only the tools with a free tier or trial. This page, the main ranking, updates when a run completes.
More about this ranking
The best AI humanizer for you is the one whose plan accepts your text length, keeps your meaning, and does not add errors you then have to fix. Price appears in every row and is never scored.
One line per situation. Each line points at the review, where the same fields appear with the plan table.
The per-request cap matters more than most buyers expect. A 2,000-word essay on a 750-word plan means three requests and three joins; the same essay on Clever AI Humanizer or HIX Bypass goes through in one.
| Tool | Monthly allowance on the entry plan | Words per request on that plan | Requests needed for a 2,000-word text |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clever AI Humanizer | No stated cap (free) | 3,000 | 1 |
| HIX Bypass | 5,000 | 3,000 | 1 |
| Phrasly | Unlimited | 5,000 | 1 |
| StealthGPT | 50,000 | 1,000 | 2 |
| Walter Writes AI | 30,000 | 750 | 3 |
| WriteHuman | 80 requests | 600 | 4 |
All figures from the vendors' pricing pages, checked on 8 November 2026. Undetectable AI, Grammarly, QuillBot Premium and Verva do not state a request cap on their pricing pages, so they are left off this table.
The site runs every tool on the same input set in the same week, checks every output on the same five detectors, and scores the results with fixed weights. The full protocol, including the input genres, detector thresholds and rater rubric, is on the method page. The short version:
| Dimension | Weight (of 100) | What is measured |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning kept | 35 | Two editors blind-rate each output against its input, 1 to 5; invented facts and dropped claims are counted separately |
| Errors introduced | 20 | Grammar, wrong-word and broken-sentence errors per 100 words, counted by the same two editors |
| Detector pass rate | 30 | Share of outputs labelled human across GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Pangram and ZeroGPT |
| Limits and access | 15 | Words per request, words per month on the tested plan, free allowance, sign-up required; price is reported, never scored |
The input set is 24 AI-written texts across six genres (school essay paragraphs, blog sections, product descriptions, professional emails, cover letters and research-style abstracts) plus 6 human-written controls, one per genre. Every input is checked on every detector before humanizing, so the change a tool makes is visible. Each run gets an ID and a folder of raw files: inputs, outputs, detector readings and both raters' scores.
Meaning kept carries the largest weight because a humanizer that lowers a detector score by changing what the text says has not done the job. The guide on whether AI humanizers work walks through the studies behind that weighting.
Each block below lists the same five fields and links the full review, the vendor's own pricing page, and the method. Order matches the table above.
Questions about AI humanizers
What is the best AI humanizer?
By list price per 10,000 words on the entry plan, Walter Writes AI leads at $2.67 (Starter, 30,000 words a month at $8 billed yearly, checked on 8 November 2026), then Humanize AI Pro at $4.99, Undetectable AI at $5.00 and StealthGPT at $6.00; the method on this site weights meaning kept above detector readings when scores are published, and price is reported, never scored.
Do AI humanizers actually work?
Paraphrasing lowers detector accuracy in peer-reviewed tests, but it also changes meaning and adds errors, which is why this site rates meaning kept and errors introduced before it counts a detector pass.
Which AI humanizer has the biggest word limit per request?
Phrasly accepts 5,000 words per input on a paid plan, Clever AI Humanizer and HIX Bypass accept 3,000, and most entry plans sit between 600 and 1,000 words per request, checked on 8 November 2026.
Is Walter Writes AI better than Undetectable AI?
The two differ most on plan shape: Walter's Starter plan gives 30,000 words a month with a 750-word request cap for $8 a month billed yearly, and Undetectable AI's entry plan gives 10,000 words a month for $5.00 a month billed yearly with no request cap stated, both checked on 8 November 2026.
How does this site rank AI humanizers?
Every tool runs on the same 24 AI inputs and 6 human controls, is checked on GPTZero, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, Pangram and ZeroGPT, and is scored with published weights: meaning kept 35, errors introduced 20, detector pass rate 30, limits and access 15.
Can a humanizer get past Turnitin?
No tool can promise that: Turnitin's detector is not available to the public, so this site reports only what Turnitin publishes about its own detection and what peer-reviewed studies found about paraphrased text.
Why do other rankings put different tools first?
Most rankings score a single detector reading on a handful of texts, while this site weights meaning kept at 35 of 100 points and detector pass rate at 30, so a tool that scrambles facts to lower a score ranks lower here than elsewhere.
Which AI humanizer is free?
Clever AI Humanizer is free with no paid plan, 3,000 words a request and no sign-up, checked on 8 November 2026; the other free tiers run from 80 words per input at BypassGPT to 125 words per input at QuillBot and 3 requests a month at 250 words at WriteHuman, with one-off trials of 300 words at Walter Writes AI and 250 at Undetectable AI.
Sources
- Humanize AI Pro pricing, read 9 November 2026: Lite $4.99 a month billed annually for 10,000 words; Standard $9.99 for 25,000 with no cap per process; free tool with no account
- Undetectable AI pricing, read 9 November 2026: 250-word trial, 10,000-word plan at $5.00 a month billed $60.00 yearly
- WriteHuman pricing, read 9 November 2026: Free 3 requests at 250 words; Basic 80 requests at 600 words, $12 yearly or $20 monthly
- QuillBot AI Humanizer, read 9 November 2026: 125-word free limit, Basic and Advanced modes, Premium removes the limit
- BypassGPT pricing, read 9 November 2026: 150 free words a month, 80 words per input, three modes
- Grammarly AI Humanizer and plans, read 8 and 9 November 2026: Free account, Pro at $12, allowance in AI prompts
- Phrasly pricing, HIX Bypass pricing, StealthGPT pricing, Verva pricing, checked 8 November 2026: Entry plan prices, trials and request caps for those four tools
- Clever AI Humanizer homepage and Walter Writes AI homepage pricing block, checked 8 November 2026: Free 3,000-word requests with no sign-up; Starter 30,000 words at $8 a month billed yearly, 750-word cap
- Weber-Wulff et al. 2023: 14 detectors tested, all below 80 percent accuracy, worse on paraphrased text
- Liang et al. 2023: 61 percent of TOEFL essays by non-native writers flagged as AI
- GPTZero technology, Copyleaks AI Detector, Originality.ai accuracy, Pangram technical report, ZeroGPT DeepAnalyse: What each detector states about its own method and error rates
Revision log
| Page published. |




